Skip to main content

ESG retirement investment gets boost from DOL: What plan sponsors should consider

Plan sponsors considering environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors in their investments received promising news with the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) latest update in November. Although ESG investing has received increased attention over the past few years, DOL has not been transparent in defining how qualified retirement programs should incorporate ESG-specific metrics into their selection process. Until recently, the prevailing tone of DOL’s messaging has been that ESG should be secondary to financial factors.

The Biden administration had hinted at loosening restrictions on ESG investing that were implemented during the final days of the Trump administration and forgone enforcement of those restrictions in the interim.

This latest development is a realization of those earlier signals. With the announcement of DOL’s new rule, plan sponsors can, but are not required to, include ESG factors in their investment searches. Notably, plan sponsors can include ESG factors in their assessment of their qualified default investment alternative (QDIA). QDIAs have historically held a substantial proportion of retirement assets and are subject to additional fiduciary scrutiny, so this marks a distinct and potentially consequential departure from DOL’s previous stance.

The appetite for ESG options varies. Some organizations will take the recent shift as an invitation to revamp their fund menus entirely, while others will stick with the status quo. Regardless of perspective, the following basic principles can help you assess ESG or any other options within your program:

  1. Do your research – Understand the wants and needs of your constituents and the underlying components of your investment array.
  2. Refine your analysis – The proliferation of ESG methodology has created innumerable options with nuanced characteristics, so it’s important to narrow the search where possible. Plan sponsors can identify ESG factors of particular significance, choose a screening methodology (include positive elements or exclude negative elements), or apply a scoring approach.
  3. Document, document, document – As with most committee-level work, it is very important to memorialize the process, decision points and rationale along the way. Remember, plan sponsors are not expected to have a crystal ball, but they are expected to act prudently at each point in their administration of the program.
  4. Confirm program governance alignment – Program governance documents like investment policy statements establish important guideposts for plan administration, so they should reflect any novel considerations.

This list is not exhaustive, and each plan sponsor’s approach will be unique. The final rule will be effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register, but there’s also no guarantee that a new iteration of DOL’s position (and the industry’s associated response) is not forthcoming, so engaging a trusted advisor for assistance may be beneficial.

Have questions? We’re here to help. Reach out to HBS with any questions or to discuss your program’s approach.

The above is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation. HANYS Benefit Services is a marketing name of Healthcare Community Securities Corp., member FINRA/SIPC, and an SEC Registered Investment Advisor.

Popular posts from this blog

What is HR vendor management? Overview with scenarios

Vendor management can be a litigious environment where efficiency, transparency and risk mitigation are paramount. With the right advisor in your organization’s corner, you’ll feel more confident navigating vendors and managing their services, ensuring streamlined processes and strategic alignment.   In this blog post, we'll cover the basics: What vendor management in HR entails, why it's important, how it can transform businesses and some scenarios in a few business types. Level up your knowledge and find the right partners to thrive.  Understanding vendor management in HR  Vendor management in HR involves the systematic management of third-party suppliers who provide goods and services essential to HR operations. This includes managing contracts, ensuring compliance with service level agreements and optimizing vendor performance to align with a company's long-term business goals.  A robust vendor management strategy can provide organizations with a structured ...
Read more

Section 125 – Cafeteria Plans Overview

A Section 125 plan, or cafeteria plan , allows employees to pay for certain benefits on a pre-tax basis. Employers use these plans to provide their employees with a choice between cash and certain qualified benefits without adverse tax consequences. Paying for benefits on a pre-tax basis reduces the employee’s taxable income and, therefore, reduces both the employee’s and the employer’s tax liability. To receive these tax advantages, a cafeteria plan must comply with the rules of Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code and related IRS regulations. Under these rules, a Section 125 plan must have a written plan document and can only offer certain qualified benefits on a tax-favored basis. Once an employee makes a Section 125 plan election, they may not change that election until the next plan year, unless the employee experiences a permitted election change event. Also, for highly compensated employees to receive the tax advantages associated with a Section 125 plan, the plan must pass ...
Read more

FMLA Outsourcing: 6 Key Employer Insights

Organizations need help navigating employee leave of absence. With so many complex regulations, many employers consider outsourcing their employee leave programs to specialized third-party vendors. Compliance with the Family and Medical Leave Act, a federal law allowing eligible employees to take unpaid leave for personal reasons, is central to administering employee leave.  In this blog, we'll go more than six insights employers need about FMLA outsourcing. Use this as your go-to list as you weigh the potential benefits against the drawbacks.  1. Third-party prowess  Expertise is at the heart of the outsourcing question. Can your in-house human resource team competently manage the complexities of FMLA requirements? Or are there benefits to be gained from a third-party vendor’s specialized focus?  In-house HR staff might need help with FMLA regulations , causing compliance errors and/or knowledge gaps. In this case, it would make sense for employers to search fo...
Read more